• General 16.06.2017

    And this should be evident by the presence of many transitional forms in the fossil record. The evidence needed to support the creation are fossils that show multiple life appeared suddenly, If we see the fossil evidence, the oldest fossils are found in Cambrian rock strata. And the thousands of millions of fossils found there are all very intricate life forms, without any evidence that these complex forms have gradually developed a simple way of life. According to the evolutionists would have required millions of years to have evolved. Could not find a single, irrefutable multicellular fossil in a rock supposedly older than Cambrian rocks. And the billions of highly complex, trilobites, brachiopods, corals, worms, jellyfish … come on suddenly with no signs of a gradual development from lower forms, as well as along the remaining fossil record, there is an extraordinary lack of transition required by evolutionary theory. Similarly, evolutionists say that perhaps 50 million years needed for a fish evolved into amphibians.

    But again, no transitional forms. For example, it has not found a single fossil with part fins part feet. And this is true of every plant and animal type. All higher categories of living beings as complex as invertebrates, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, bats, primates and man, appear abruptly. If evolution is true, why do not we see stages of evolution living today? Should not even be appearing new bodies and new structures? If evolutionary processes have actually existed in the past, would still be performing.

    Posted by millionaire @ 2:18 pm for General |

    Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


© 2010-2019 One Million Red Ribbons All Rights Reserved